We surveyed organisations that submitted an application in Round One of the New Investment and Contract Consolidation pathways. Respondents represented a mix of small to large organisations.
Below is a summary of what you told us and what we are doing about it.
You told us that:
|
You said: More detailed and worked examples were needed. Survey respondents found Theory of Change the hardest area, along with outcomes, delivery confidence, and sector wide learning. |
Our aim is to provide guidance that is clear, practical, and easy to follow so you feel supported throughout the application process. We will continue to refine and improve our guidance materials for any future rounds based on your feedback. |
|
You said: The effort required felt high for a Registration of Interest/Expression of Interest stage. Survey respondents, particularly from smaller organisations felt the workload was not proportional to the likelihood of progressing. |
We recognise that your time is valuable. We have designed the Registration of Interest stage to request only the essential information needed to make a well‑informed and robust decision about which organisations progress to the Request for Proposal stage. To help ensure your time and resources are well spent, we have strengthened our early‑stage guidance with clearer criteria and expectations, reducing the risk of organisations investing effort in applications that may not be a good fit. We have also expanded our support materials, including further webinars, updated FAQs, examples of proposals funded in Round One, and a self‑assessment tool, to help you quickly assess your alignment and decide whether applying is the best use of your time and resources. |
|
You said: Improve the portal user experience. Survey respondents reported issues with file uploads, character limits, and difficulty reviewing or editing answers before submitting. |
In response to this we have made several enhancements to our system including improving the visibility of file uploads, increasing character limits across key sections of the application to support applicants to tell us about their proposal, and continuing to monitor all technical issues that are submitted by portal users via ServiceDesk@sia.govt.nz. |
|
You said: Create more opportunities for human connection. Survey respondents wanted the chance to talk to their application in person, ask questions, or clarify expectations. |
In response to this we will include an opportunity for organisations shortlisted for the New Investment Pathway Round Two Request for Proposal (RFP) stage to meet with the evaluation panel to present their proposal, ask questions, and respond to questions from the panel. |
|
You said: Address perceptions of fairness and equity. Some survey respondents felt the process favoured larger or more established organisations. |
The Fund represents a small portion of social sector funding (less than 1%) and is designed to test and demonstrate new ways of working. To do so it requires us to partner with organisations that have the capacity and capability to collect and share data, reach a minimum number of people, and demonstrate more mature Theory of Change (ToC) capabilities. This approach will enable us to build a stable foundation for the Fund and means we will be focussing on working with organisations that are well positioned to scale at pace. |
We value every piece of feedback we receive and hearing from our applicants helps us understand what we are doing well and where we can improve.
As part of our commitment to continuous improvement, we are taking steps to make future surveys more engaging and easier to complete. We will:
Thank you to everyone who has taken the time to share their experience with us. We are grateful for your insights and the chance to learn from you.